Talk:Gargamel: Guilds: Difference between revisions

From Immortal Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: I like the direction you're going with this! First comment, for things like the Crusaders Might skills, I would think to implement it more like stackable, instead of ranged. * For exampl...
 
Gargamel (talk | contribs)
New section: re: bz comments
Line 12: Line 12:


--[[User:Brazil|Brazil]] 13:16, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
--[[User:Brazil|Brazil]] 13:16, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
== re: bz comments ==
hmmm... i see what you're saying.  after i went back in and re-read the skill/spell idea, i had envisioned it the way you mentioned, but i wrote it down differently...
so you don't see any problems for me expanding each one of these?
i guess we could talk about guild requirements and latent bonuses/penalties at some point in the future also (maybe they dont need to have bonuses/penalties)
--[[User:Gargamel|Gargamel]]

Revision as of 00:15, 2 October 2008

I like the direction you're going with this!

First comment, for things like the Crusaders Might skills, I would think to implement it more like stackable, instead of ranged.

  • For example. If you have CM#1 only, you get the 10% bonus when your align is 350-1000.
  • When you gain CM#2, you get 10% bonus from 350-500, and the 20% from 500-1000
  • When you gain CM#3, you get 10% from 350-550, 20% from 550-800, 30% from 800-1000

Then if you only practice #2 and not #1, you don't get the 10% from 350-500.

What do you think?

--Brazil 13:16, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

re: bz comments

hmmm... i see what you're saying. after i went back in and re-read the skill/spell idea, i had envisioned it the way you mentioned, but i wrote it down differently...

so you don't see any problems for me expanding each one of these?

i guess we could talk about guild requirements and latent bonuses/penalties at some point in the future also (maybe they dont need to have bonuses/penalties)

--Gargamel